change language
you are in: home - ecumenis...dialogue - internat...or peace - assisi 2...or peace contact usnewsletterlink

Support the Community

  

Sant'Egidio at the UN Security Council to report on the situation in the Central African Republic

Mauro Garofalo: "The success of this beginning of disarmament is the credibility of the whole process"

A Conference remembering the 25 years from the signing of the peace in Mozambique: The Italian model that has given hope to Africa

A Peace made by mediators without vested interests and who believed that peace was always possible

Let us help Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh

The Community of Sant'Egidio launches a fundraising campaign to send humanitarian aid to the refugee camps in Bangladesh, in collaboration with the local Church

Paths of Peace: textes, videos and news of the International Meeting of prayer for peace of Münster

11/20/2017
Prayer for peace

The Everyday Prayer


 
printable version
September 19 2016 09:30 | Auditorium Grand Hotel Congressi

Speech of M’hamed Krichen



M'hamed Krichen


"Al-Jazeera", Tunisia

Is it easy for any media to set the news according to its points of view and ignore the facts on the ground? This is the big question which is still in the heart of many debates.

Propaganda for war? Is it always accurate to say that? When any new media covers a war between 2 countries or more, or a civil war in any country, can we blame it for propaganda for war? Do we have a strict criteria to make the difference between "Reporting" and "promoting"?

The war against terrorism (since 9/11) has amplified this issue: did "Aljazeera" for example make a mistake when airing Ben Laden tapes (even after editing each speech)?

Is it easy to deal fairly between two versions, of any event or developing story, when one is official (US Government or UK Government for example) and the other is Al-Qaida's or ISIS' (ISIL or Daech) point of view?

The right to know is it applicable even in such cases? And how to do it without being blamed for propaganda? The case becomes worse when the accusation becomes propaganda for terrorism ( in the past, a real campaign against "Aljazeera" about airing Ben Laden tapes and now about talking of Isis statements or even about refusing the use of "Daech").

The problem has recently become more complicated with the use of Social Media: Facebook, Twitter and Google are not doing enough to prevent their social networks from being used by extremists for a recruitment drive, a panel of British MPs said last month. A spokesman for YouTube, which is owned by Google, said it would keep working with Britain's government to see what more can be done. In August Twitter said that it had cut off 235,000 accounts in the last six months, raising the overall figure it had suspended to 360,000 since mid-2015.

For journalists, The propaganda for war or the propaganda for terror is too linked to the political and cultural background of its users. Example: Dave Lee, BBC North America technology reporter in San Francisco said after Twitter's actions "The big question is what happens next. Terrorists will carry on making more accounts, as well as migrating to other platforms. And questions will be raised about the removal process. Who decides? Who's keeping watch? The definition and perpetrators of terrorism can change depending on your geography and political views. Twitter will now be asked: why not fascist tweets? Or anti-Israel? Anti-Palestine? Anti-women? Anti-[insert cause here]?"

On the other hand, how can we promote Peace in Media without failing in a very simple and naïve way of moral Propaganda?? It is a real challenge but I think that this goal could be achieved gradually by giving, as much as possible, the priority for commenting and analyzing to moderate figures rather than radical or extremist commentators, from different sides. 

Maybe the news agenda can help a little bit by trying very carefully to encourage any Peace Process or Peace Agreements in many current military conflicts (in Syria, Yemen, Libya etc.) lead by United Nations, despite any remarks regarding their way of processing.

The profile of journalists can help too. Many Unions or associations can help in training journalists on this issue: as the journalists need training in War Reporting and First Aid, we can also try to train them about negotiating and Peace Processes and the Art of Negotiating and compromise etc.

We can try to create some occasions of meeting between journalists covering war from opposite sides, in order to change information and points of view and in order to find if there is any way to encourage any peace changes that could appear. 

 

#peaceispossible #thirstforpeace
PROGRAMME

ASSOCIATED PRESS
October 29 2016
La Civiltà Cattolica
Intervista a Papa Francesco in occasione del viaggio apostolico in Svezia
October 5 2016
Avvenire
Marco Impagliazzo: Nel tempo del noi
October 2 2016
Avvenire
Quale accoglienza? Il metodo «adottivo» che emerge da Assisi
September 30 2016
Vida Nueva
Marco Impagliazzo: “Los líderes musulmanes deben denunciar con más valentía el terrorismo”
September 30 2016
Il Ticino
Alle sorgenti della pace in un mondo assetato
all press-related


Giovani x la Pace